![实用关节镜手术学](https://wfqqreader-1252317822.image.myqcloud.com/cover/89/917089/b_917089.jpg)
第三章 关节功能评价
第一节 肩关节功能评分
一、UCLA肩关节评分系统
UCLA评分系统
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00052001.jpg?sign=1739271324-vEEF6P5yfb5ueagkJe0LDw1ZKzlQ3zQC-0-cca78b3fae23fc83f8089757d36c97dc)
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00053001.jpg?sign=1739271324-aSMsMzI3pY2xPR9EbfSm3wefZxb6jwqB-0-6119cdc8bb05244151c3146c5dfbec62)
注:1.UCLA即The university of California-Los Angeles的缩写。
2.肩关节评分系统总分为35分。优为34~35分;良为29~33分;差为<29分。
3.来源:Ellman H,Hanker G,Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff: End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1986,68:1136-1144.
二、Constant和Murley肩关节评分
Constant和Murley肩关节评分
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00053002.jpg?sign=1739271324-Ffnapx06Ka3g8DpgY6QBR3de4VHMgl1e-0-9b872d5e005c01c80d1c04711b892cdf)
来源:Constant C R,Murley A H G. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop,1987,214:160-164.
三、美国肩肘外科评分
美国肩肘外科评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scale)
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00054002.jpg?sign=1739271324-s4pchVfMFXBD1B0igZI6TwLzhSLwliEo-0-17053b6c9c53aa73d0fa48ada592f912)
来源:Richards R R,An K-N,Rigliani L U,et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1994,3:347-352.
四、Rowes评分系统
Rowes评分(Rowes Rating System for Bankart Repair)主要用于评价肩关节Bankart损伤手术后疗效评价,分值权重侧重于肩关节的稳定性。优为100~90分;良为89~75分;可为74~51分;差为50或50以下。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00055001.jpg?sign=1739271324-S4WtJ0qbsBmg070DfMu2pj0sUth59o7f-0-44b3cc1748da95426eda357f2254ac03)
来源:Rowe CR,Patel D,Southmayd WW. The Bankart procedure:A long term end-result study. J Bone Joint Sury(Am).1978,60:1-16.
五、HSS肩关节评分系统
HSS(hospital for special surgery shoulder-rating score sheet)用于肩峰撞击综合征、肩峰成形术的疗效评价。比较注重对于疼痛的评定。优为90~100分;良为70~89分;可为50~69分;差为50分以下。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00055002.jpg?sign=1739271324-j9zGBV6c2dUUvA3o6lYondNVmkf99ixt-0-d0e090920d80b25069271083dd67fff7)
源自:Altcheck D W,Warren R F,Wickiewiez T L,et al. Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and result. J Bone Joint Sury(Am),1990,72:1198-1207.
六、国人肩关节功能评分表
1.疼痛与夜间痛(20分)
带刻度VAS评分,两端表示极端情况,让患者自己划出疼痛状况。
(1)疼痛量表(10分)
(2)夜间痛量表(10分)
2.生活相关的功能活动(27分)
总计9条,能完成1条记为3分。
3.肌力和关节活动度(32分)
①肩部肌力(12分,双侧对比进行)
②肩关节活动度(20分)
4.医患满意度(21分)
医患双方分别在自己的VAS线上评出满意度,最后用满意度表盖上得出分数。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00058001.jpg?sign=1739271324-nlXoePvP4rXUGGZURc4oA3zJq6ZQ9uTI-0-4ee4cbc1862f8ba1ce8e760d465b01a6)
(来自:复旦大学华山医院陈世益中国人肩关节功能评分系统的研究与制定)